First time here? Maybe read the FAQ.
x
Site Updates
  • Sep 2024 — kthomps5 gets promotion to Moderator!
  • 7 Dec 2023 — Bug fix: now anyone can access the monthly top scores.
  • 1 Sep 2023 — Monthly top scores now listed
  • 6 Jul 2023 — Get points for comment upvotes.

RSS Feeds
Other ID Resources
When It’s Not a Font
See Also
2022_10_07_T072642AM.png

Used on Cargo Site's Useful Music page. Can't find another use on their site that would work with web inspector since these are all images. 

asked by (2 points)

1 Answer

+2 votes
 
Best answer

It’s EB Garamond.

answered by Editor (8.8k points)
selected by
0

Didn't mean to post a whole other question, my bad. 
I think you're right, but when I recreate it in Indesign there's very slight differences. The corners are less sharp in the example, the serif on the i is straighter. 

+2

Sorry, I was curt before. EB Garamond originally came in two optical sizes, i.e. different cuts, each of which is intended for a specific range of sizes. EB Garamond 08 (= meant for small sizes around 8pt) is what you’re looking for. The version available on Google Fonts is a newer one which offers more weights, but only for what used to be the 12pt size. You can download the older one from Bitbucket.

0
Aha! So Cargo took a smaller optical size and scaled it up. I wonder why, maybe you know why people do that. I figured something like this was going on, thanks so much for your help.
+1

Right, they used it in a different size than intended by the type designer. The 08 cut exhibits some of the typical adjustments made for small sizes: sturdier strokes with a bit more weight and less contrast (emulating the ink spread which has a stronger effect in smaller sizes) and more compact vertical proportions (shorter extenders). Shoko Mugikura and Tim Ahrens wrote a whole book about this topic – it’s excellent.

For the question why Cargo picked the “wrong” size: the answer to that probably is “because it looked better”. Someone must have liked the rough and hefty look.

0
The ink! Easy to forget in our digital world. I would have thought that longer extenders would enhance legibility at small sizes, to distinguish characters better. But, I guess it could make the textblock look spotty or cluttered. I bet there's a book with these answers...

I was actually looking at using Lapture for a project the other day. Maybe now I have to pick up that book and use the caption size at display sizes.

It's always tricky to tell if something is because "it looked better" or if there's a deeper meaning or convention I'm unaware of. Thanks for your responses Florian! I think I'll stick around and learn some things
...