Totally possible – both that it is a font, and that it’s available on MyFonts.
Now MyFonts as a brand can’t be called obscure. When it comes to releases on MyFonts from recent years, I’d argue the answer is different. MyFonts takes pride in sheer quantity (“the largest font marketplace in the world”, “Over 270,000 available fonts, and counting”), but there are hardly any useful ways of visual discovery anymore, beyond six big buckets and a couple of filters (which don’t seem to be maintained very well either: the first hit for “contrast: high” is Cocogoose). Tags are meaningless as well (one would expect that MT at least honed their own bestsellers, but Helvetica currently is tagged with junk like “testkeyword”, “jan28prodowntag”, “20191308”, “gokuldai”).
WhatTheFont used to be a decent way of finding something visually, but not anymore. As Kevin exemplified with a previous request of yours, newer releases aren’t included in its database, it seems.
What I’m getting at with this rant: fonts released onto the ever-growing pile that is MyFonts are now just as obscure (as in: hidden in the dark) as those that are made available via the designer’s Instagram: without having a name, they can’t be found.
