Site Updates
  • Aug 2025 — Removed "hide” function so all visitors benefit from an archive of answers.
  • Sep 2024 — kthomps5 gets promotion to Moderator!
  • 7 Dec 2023 — Bug fix: now anyone can access the monthly top scores.
  • 1 Sep 2023 — Monthly top scores now listed
  • 6 Jul 2023 — Get points for comment upvotes.

RSS Feeds
Other ID Resources
When It’s Not a Font
See Also
EF9E30D0-8CB4-4B01-9B2A-1E1F3EE77624.jpeg
4BC41822-5D92-4163-BF79-63A3C9193AAD.jpeg
I searched the USMA library's collection of class rings to see when the typeface first appeared.  Very old rings are completly worn down so the words/typface are indistinguishable.  I did find one from 1926 with the typefce in question.  The builidng in my attached photo example was built in 1931.  The timeframe might be helpful.  I've searched the web as best I can but am coming up empty.  I hope someone with expertise can help.
asked by (0 points)

1 Answer

+2 votes

Unfortunately, both of your images are examples of hand-carved lettering.

 

Unless someone with a love of West Point and typography has backwards-engineered typefaces based on siimilar samples, you won't find equivalents among digital fonts.

answered by Moderator (23.0k points)
+1

What Kevin says. There aren’t many common letters between the two samples, but the T appears in both, and it has a very different form in each.

One typeface that is vaguely related in its uncialish style is Numismatisch. Designed by Otto Hupp specifically for reproducing medieval seals and similar inscriptions, it was available at the DeVinne Press in New York. James Grieshaber made a digital interpretation as P22 Numismatic.

...