First time here? Maybe read the FAQ.
x
Site Updates
  • Aug 2025 — Removed "hide” function so all visitors benefit from an archive of answers.
  • Sep 2024 — kthomps5 gets promotion to Moderator!
  • 7 Dec 2023 — Bug fix: now anyone can access the monthly top scores.
  • 1 Sep 2023 — Monthly top scores now listed
  • 6 Jul 2023 — Get points for comment upvotes.

RSS Feeds
Other ID Resources
When It’s Not a Font
See Also
Screenshot 2024-06-30 at 14.43.34.jpg

From Fonts In Use. Note the bracketed serifs, the concave stem endings in r and n, the descending f, and the W with no middle serifs.

It’s similar to the italics of Modern No. 20, but bolder. I suspect it to be a phototypeface, but came up empty so far. Photo-Lettering had a couple of faces that come close, including Criterion and Torino, but I failed to spot a match.

asked by Moderator (11.2k points)
+1
I’m stumped, too! That ‘C’ is pretty narrow compared to anything else in the category I see.

Also, in 1963 there was still plenty of handlettering going on in comparison to phototypesetting. Even though the lettershapes seem to duplicate, I think there’s a good chance it was drawn for the headline.
0
Thanks for checking! Yes, I agree with your conclusion.
+2
I think I found it? It must be Regency Bold Italic by The Headliners
+1

All I’ve seen from Regency is a flip-through video of a 1962 specimen posted by Stewf. It doesn’t show all the glyphs, and the resolution is too low to tell whether glyphs like n have cupped serifs (as on the cover) or not. But yes, it looks like it could be a match. Time and place (United States, early 1960s) check out as well. Congrats, I think you found it!

+2
Well done, Javi! Please post this as an answer. Meanwhile, I’ll get a proper scan of this page.
0
It's on Font in Use
0
Saw that! What I mean is that you should post your correct identification in the Answer field below. That way we can see at a glance that this request was answered.

1 Answer

0 votes
answered by Moderator (12.8k points)
...